Settlement of Inheritance Disputes by A Mediator Through Mediation at The Bima Religious Court

Andi Muhammad Galib; Zuhrah Zuhrah; Muhammad Amin

doi:10.51612/teunuleh.v7i2.260

Authors

Andi Muhammad Galib Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Zuhrah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Muhammad Amin Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51612/teunuleh.v7i2.260

Abstract

This study examines the mediation of inheritance disputes by mediators at the Bima Religious Court. Inheritance disputes often lead to ongoing debates due to differences in interests, understanding of Islamic inheritance law, and the influence of customs and family relationships. Therefore, mediation is considered a solution that can foster harmony and maintain relationships between heirs. This study aims to analyze how mediation is conducted, the factors that contribute to its success, and the factors that cause its failure in resolving inheritance disputes at the Bima Religious Court. This study uses empirical methods. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving judge mediators, non-judge mediators, and other related individuals. The results show that the mediation process occurs in several stages: pre-mediation steps, mediation, and implementation of mediation results in accordance with PERMA Number 1 of 2016. The success of mediation is influenced by the mediator's neutrality, ability to facilitate communication, and the sincere intentions of the participants. However, mediation may be unsuccessful due to a lack of participants or the mediator's lack of understanding of the issues at hand. Therefore, increasing the effectiveness of mediation requires strengthening the role of the mediator and increasing the parties' recognition of the value of achieving a peaceful resolution.

Keywords:

Meditation, Inheritance Disputes, Judge Mediator, Religious Court, Islamic Inheritance Law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdur Rahman Adi Saputera, Umar Jaya, Annisa Podungge, S. S. (2021). ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PERATURAN MA NO 1 TAHUN 2016 TERHADAP TINGKAT KEBERHASILAN MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA GORONTALO DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SUWAWA Abdur. 3(1), 1–20.

Andri, G. Y., Hukum, F., Swadaya, U., Jati, G., Perdamaian, P., & Perdamaian, P. (2022). Kekuatan akta perdamaian dan masalahnya. 13(2), 57–68.

Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, hlm 163.

Aziza, T. D. (2021). PENERAPAN METODE RADD DALAM PRAKTIK HUKUM WARIS ISLAM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI). 32(3), 167–186.

Djuhrijjani. (2024). Komunikasi Efektif dalam Mediasi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. 5(9), 5692–5704.

Fahri, H. (2025). Jurnal Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Hukum dan Kesejahteraan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kesejahteraan, 6(1), 44–59.

HAFID, M., & ARKHAN, M. A. (2023). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS MENGGUNAKAN MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA. 13–24.

Handini. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu Group, 2020, hlm. 149.

Hariati, S. (2024). Penerapan Hukum Waris Islam Pasca Berlakunya Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 10(3), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.666

Khairuddin. (2025). EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI BERBASIS WASATHIYAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KELUARGA ISLAM: STUDI EMPIRIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA Khairuddin UIN Raden Intan Lampung khairuddinmh@radenintan.ac. 11(2).

Nahda, S., Abra, E. H., & Handayani, P. (2025). Pelaksanaan Mediasi Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Implementation of Mediation Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 on Mediation Procedure. 8(3), 7–9.

NURHIDAYAH. (2020). EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA ANTARA PARA PIHAK DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SUNGGUMINASA.

Purba, M. S. M. (2018). REKONSTRUKSI PERMA No. 1 TAHUN 2016 SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PENGADILAN. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i1.693

Rahmadhani, A. (2025). Efektivitas Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Komunitas. 1(1), 8–14.

Ramadhani, S. I. (2022). Akta Perdamaian Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 240 / PDT . G / 2020 / PN SDA ). 4.

Rosdianti, V. M., Citrawati, R., & Malang, U. I. (2025). KONFLIK KEWARISAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA?: DAMPAKNYA. 414–428.

Subrata, R., Arifin, F., & Maarif, I. (2025). Hybrid Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law: Toward an Integrated Model for Government Conflict Management. Journal of Judicial Review, 27(1), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10462

Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF DAN R &. D.

Syahrizal Abbas. (2018). ANTOLOGI PEMIKIRAN HUKUM SYARIAH.

Yuliana, I., Fakultas, N., & Pasundan, U. (2023). Mediasi Yang Tidak Dihadiri Salah Satu Pihak Tetapi Menghasilkan Akta Damai. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11111.

Yusuf, M., & Dahlan, A. (2025). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Van Dading Hasil Mediasi Sebagai Bagian Dari Putusan Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tebing Tinggi. 9(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2.5024