Application of Numbered Head Together (NHT) Cooperative Learning Models in Improving Learning Outcomes on Social Problems In Grade IV of Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51612/teunuleh.v4i1.130Abstract
Model cooperative learning Numbered Head Together (NHT) in teaching and learning activities in social studies with the subject matter of the social problems in the fourth grade Elementary School Superior Lampeuneurut. The formulation of this research through cooperative learning increases learning motivation, self-confidence. The purpose of this study is to determine learning motivation, self-confidence and improve student learning outcomes. Classroom Action Research (PTK) in grade IV SD Negeri Unggul Lampeuneurut students were carried out in two cycles. Each cycle consists of four stages, namely planning, implementing, acting, observing and reflecting. The results of this study obtained Activities teachers during the first cycle obtained an average score of 3, 61 (72.30%), including both categories and activities students gain an average score of 3.38 (67.5%) were included in both categories. Activities during the second cycle teachers earn an average score of 4, 54 (90.90%) and included in the excellent category. Activity of students during cooperative learning NHT in the second cycle obtain an average value of 4, 5 (90%) including category very well. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that learning social problems by applying the cooperative model type NHT increases the completeness of learning outcomes in grade IV students. SD Negeri Unggul Lampeuneurut. The increase in the average acquisition score of the first cycle of 65, 83 (54.16%), the second cycle of 75.83 (66.66%) increased by 12.5%.
Keywords:
Coperative Learning Model, Numbered Head Together, Learnig OutcomesDownloads
References
Barreto, D. V. (2017). Motivation and Learning Engagement Through Playing Math Video Games. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 1-21.
Bossé, M., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2011). Stop Teaching and Let Students Learn Geometry. Mathematics Teacher, 105(4), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.105.4.0293.
Freudenthal, H. (2002). Revisiting Mathematics Education. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational Development and Developmental Research in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/749485.
Gravemeijer, K. (2016). Real, Meaningful Mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0026-1.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning Design Perspective. Dalam In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds). Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
Hedegaard, M. (1998). Situated Learning and Cognition: Theoretical Learning and Cognition. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0502_5.
Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. &. (2005). Young Children Learn Measurement and geometry. A Learning-Teaching Trajectory with Intermediate Attainment Targets for The Lower Grades in Primary School. Utrecht: The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
Johar, R., Sri, Y., & Saminan. (2015). The Analysis of Proportional Reasoning Problem in The Indonesian Mathematics Textbook for The Junior High School. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55-68.
Kasmini, L., & Mardhatillah. (2020). The Influence of Aceh Culture-Based Learning Model (MPB2A) Integrated Media Information Communication and Technology on Student Learning Outcomes In Science Learning. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 2051–2058.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Mardhatillah, Sari, S. M., Surjono, H., & Muhtadi, A. (2019). Development of Teacher and Student Thematic Learning Books Based on Gender and Diversity for Elementary School Students in District of Aceh Barat. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 896-898.
Munawanah, S. (2015). Nasionalisme Melalui Pendidikan Agama Pada Peserta Didik SMA/SMK/MA di Wilayah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Smart: Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi, 1(2), 137–150.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17957.x.
Santyasa, I. W. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Makalah.
Sari, I. K., Nasriadi, A., & Salmina, M. (2018). Students’ Understanding of Charts: The Study of PISA's Problem-Solving in the Content of Data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012108.
Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia; Konstatasi Keadaan Masa Kini Menuju Harapan Masa Depan. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti. Depdiknas.
Sudjana. (2002). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Treffers, A. (1993). Wiskobas and Freudenthal Realistic Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274104.
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2008). An Alternative Interpretation of the Relationship between Self-Concept and Mathematics Achievement: Comparison of Chinese and US Students as a Context. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(3), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790802485203.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmiah Teunuleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
